Pancreatic Cancer Research

ResearcherUtrecht UniversityActive in the last 2 years

Thijs J. Schouten

Matched on ORCID iD 0000-0001-6223-5719; OpenAlex author ID A5083521449. Sources: OpenAlex.

Their work

Papers
19 (first author 4, last author 0)
Trials
0
Grants
0
Labs led
0
Collaborators
70
Papers, trials and grants by year

2021: 2 papers · 2022: 6 papers · 2023: none · 2024: 3 papers · 2025: 3 papers · 2026: 5 papers

Papers 19

  1. Survival benefit of recurrence-focused treatment after surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A propensity score matched analysis of patients from a Dut… Co-author DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2026.117776↗
  2. Contemporary challenges in long-term survival prediction in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a transatlantic multicenter development and validation o… Co-author DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2026.04.453↗
  3. Implications of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Prognostic Factors in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Path Towards Personalized Prognostication. Co-author DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000006660↗
  4. Impact of Different Primary Treatment Strategies on Recurrence-Focused Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Co-author DOI 10.1245/s10434-025-18639-1↗
  5. ASO Visual Abstract: Impact of Different Primary Treatment Strategies on Recurrence-Focused Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Co-author DOI 10.1245/s10434-025-18791-8↗
  6. Time-varying impact of established prognostic factors in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Co-author DOI 10.1093/jnci/djaf196↗
  7. Evaluation of Short and Long-term Outcomes After Resection in Patients With Locally Advanced Versus (Borderline) Resectable Pancreatic Cancer. First author DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000006289↗
  8. Perineural Invasion is an Important Prognostic Factor in Patients With Radically Resected (R0) and Node-negative (pN0) Pancreatic Cancer. Co-author DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000006320↗
  9. Predicting Long-term Disease-free Survival After Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Nationwide Cohort Study. First author DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000006004↗
  10. Poor Prognostic Factors in Long-Term Survivors of Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: An International, Multicenter Cohort Study. Co-author DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000006539↗
  11. The Value of Biological and Conditional Factors for Staging of Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Upfront Resection: A Nationwide Analysis. Co-author DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15070-w↗
  12. Nationwide Validation of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System and Five Proposed Modifications for Resected Pancreatic Cancer. Co-author DOI 10.1245/s10434-022-11664-4↗
  13. ASO Author Reflections: The Need for Improvement of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System for Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Co-author DOI 10.1245/s10434-022-11738-3↗
  14. Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Pancreatic Cancer Resection in Elderly Patients: A Nationwide Analysis. First author DOI 10.1245/s10434-022-11831-7↗
  15. ASO Author Reflections: Nationwide Reflection of Clinical Outcomes in Elderly Patients after Resection of Pancreatic Cancer. First author DOI 10.1245/s10434-022-11920-7↗
  16. Response to: Commentary on: "Nationwide Validation of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System and Five Proposed Modifications for Resecte… Co-author DOI 10.1245/s10434-022-12168-x↗
  17. Correction to: Nationwide Validation of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System and Five Proposed Modifications for Resected Pancreatic C… Co-author DOI 10.1245/s10434-022-12182-z↗
  18. Treatment strategies and clinical outcomes in consecutive patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A multicenter prospective cohort. Co-author DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.11.137↗
  19. Microscopic resection margin status in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - A nationwide analysis. Co-author DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.11.145↗

Closest collaborators

The 25 strongest of 70 by collab_strength@1: shared papers, trials and grants, recent and small-team work weighing most.

  1. Izaak Quintus Molenaar · 19 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 3.16
  2. Hjalmar C. van Santvoort · 19 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 3.16
  3. Lois A. Daamen · 18 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 3.08
  4. Marc G. Besselink · 16 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 2.51
  5. Martijn W.J. Stommel · 15 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 2.27
  6. Bas Groot Koerkamp · 14 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 2.22
  7. Sebastiaan Festen · 14 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 2.06
  8. Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh · 14 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 2.06
  9. Vincent Erwin de Meijer · 12 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 1.79
  10. Geert Kazemier M · 12 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 1.77
  11. Iris W.J.M. van Goor · 10 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 1.72
  12. Paul C. M. Andel · 7 shared papers, 2024–2026 · strength 1.33
  13. Bert A. Bonsing · 9 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 1.33
  14. Robert C. Verdonk · 7 shared papers, 2022–2026 · strength 1.12
  15. Gijs A. Patijn · 7 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 1.09
  16. Martijn Intven · 7 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 1.01
  17. Vincent B. Nieuwenhuijs · 7 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 0.97
  18. Joseph R. Habib · 5 shared papers, 2024–2026 · strength 0.93
  19. Ammar A. Javed · 5 shared papers, 2024–2026 · strength 0.93
  20. Vincent P. Groot · 5 shared papers, 2022–2026 · strength 0.83
  21. Lodewijk A.A. Brosens · 6 shared papers, 2021–2025 · strength 0.77
  22. Omar Mahmud · 4 shared papers, 2024–2026 · strength 0.72
  23. Ingmar Florin Rompen · 4 shared papers, 2024–2026 · strength 0.72
  24. Thomas F. Stoop · 4 shared papers, 2024–2026 · strength 0.72
  25. Christopher Lee Wolfgang · 4 shared papers, 2024–2026 · strength 0.72

How to reach this person

A chain of introductions through people who have published, run trials or held grants together (warm_path@1: fewest links first, then the strongest). Built from public records only; no contact details are kept.