ResearcherOsaka National HospitalActive in the last 2 years
Masanori Tsujie
Matched on ORCID iD 0000-0002-1265-3397; OpenAlex author ID A5079989633. Sources: OpenAlex.
Their work
- Papers
- 10
- Trials
- 0
- Grants
- 0
- Labs led
- 0
- Collaborators
- 24
2016: 1 paper · 2017: none · 2018: 1 paper · 2019: 1 paper · 2020: 1 paper · 2021: 1 paper · 2022: 1 paper · 2023: none · 2024: 2 papers · 2025: 1 paper · 2026: 1 paper
Papers 10
- Study protocol: A randomized controlled trial of chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable pancreatic cancer (CSGO-HBP-027). Co-author DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0345459↗
- Post hoc subgroup analysis of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus S1 vs gemcitabine plus nab paclitaxel in elderly resectable/borderline resectable pancreatic adenoca… Co-author DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-23185-7↗
- Results of a Randomized Clinical Study of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Plus S-1 as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable and Borderline… Co-author DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15199-8↗
- ASO Author Reflections: Which was the Better Regimen (Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Plus S-1) as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Localized Pa… Co-author DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15244-6↗
- [A Case of Resection of Sigmoid Colon Metastasis from Pancreatic Cancer]. Co-author PMID 36733076↗
- Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine and nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel combination therapy as neoadj… Co-author DOI 10.1186/s13063-021-05541-w↗
- A Case of Pathological Complete Response Following FOLFIRINOX Therapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Synchronous Distant Lymph Node Metastases. Co-author DOI 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.06.044↗
- [Outcomes of FOLFIRINOX as First-Line Treatment for Recurrent or Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer]. Co-author PMID 31501367↗
- CA19-9 level determines therapeutic modality in pancreatic cancer patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Co-author DOI 10.1016/j.hbpd.2018.01.004↗
- Prognostic impact of preoperative NLR and CA19-9 in pancreatic cancer. Co-author DOI 10.1016/j.pan.2015.10.006↗
Closest collaborators
The 24 strongest of 24 by collab_strength@1: shared papers, trials and grants, recent and small-team work weighing most.
- Tadafumi Asaoka · 7 shared papers, 2016–2026 · strength 1.01
- Paper Study protocol: A randomized controlled trial of chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for resec… DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0345459↗
- Paper Post hoc subgroup analysis of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus S1 vs gemcitabine plus nab paclitaxel in elderly resectable/… DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-23185-7↗
- Paper Results of a Randomized Clinical Study of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Plus S-1 as Neoadjuvant Ch… DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15199-8↗
- Masahiro Tanemura · 5 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 0.87
- Paper Study protocol: A randomized controlled trial of chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for resec… DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0345459↗
- Paper Post hoc subgroup analysis of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus S1 vs gemcitabine plus nab paclitaxel in elderly resectable/… DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-23185-7↗
- Paper Results of a Randomized Clinical Study of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Plus S-1 as Neoadjuvant Ch… DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15199-8↗
- Yuichiro Doki · 5 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 0.87
- Paper Study protocol: A randomized controlled trial of chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for resec… DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0345459↗
- Paper Post hoc subgroup analysis of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus S1 vs gemcitabine plus nab paclitaxel in elderly resectable/… DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-23185-7↗
- Paper Results of a Randomized Clinical Study of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Plus S-1 as Neoadjuvant Ch… DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15199-8↗
- Hirofumi Akita · 5 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 0.87
- Paper Study protocol: A randomized controlled trial of chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for resec… DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0345459↗
- Paper Post hoc subgroup analysis of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus S1 vs gemcitabine plus nab paclitaxel in elderly resectable/… DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-23185-7↗
- Paper Results of a Randomized Clinical Study of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Plus S-1 as Neoadjuvant Ch… DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15199-8↗
- Yoshifumi Iwagami · 4 shared papers, 2024–2026 · strength 0.77
- Paper Study protocol: A randomized controlled trial of chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for resec… DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0345459↗
- Paper Post hoc subgroup analysis of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus S1 vs gemcitabine plus nab paclitaxel in elderly resectable/… DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-23185-7↗
- Paper Results of a Randomized Clinical Study of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Plus S-1 as Neoadjuvant Ch… DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15199-8↗
- Hidetoshi Eguchi · 4 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 0.67
- Paper Study protocol: A randomized controlled trial of chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for resec… DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0345459↗
- Paper Results of a Randomized Clinical Study of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Plus S-1 as Neoadjuvant Ch… DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15199-8↗
- Paper ASO Author Reflections: Which was the Better Regimen (Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Plus S-1) as N… DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15244-6↗
- Osakuni Morimoto · 4 shared papers, 2021–2025 · strength 0.65
- Paper Post hoc subgroup analysis of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus S1 vs gemcitabine plus nab paclitaxel in elderly resectable/… DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-23185-7↗
- Paper Results of a Randomized Clinical Study of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Plus S-1 as Neoadjuvant Ch… DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15199-8↗
- Paper ASO Author Reflections: Which was the Better Regimen (Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Plus S-1) as N… DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15244-6↗
- Daisaku Yamada · 4 shared papers, 2021–2025 · strength 0.65
- Paper Post hoc subgroup analysis of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus S1 vs gemcitabine plus nab paclitaxel in elderly resectable/… DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-23185-7↗
- Paper Results of a Randomized Clinical Study of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Plus S-1 as Neoadjuvant Ch… DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15199-8↗
- Paper ASO Author Reflections: Which was the Better Regimen (Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Plus S-1) as N… DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15244-6↗
- Yutaka Takeda · 4 shared papers, 2021–2025 · strength 0.65
- Paper Post hoc subgroup analysis of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus S1 vs gemcitabine plus nab paclitaxel in elderly resectable/… DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-23185-7↗
- Paper Results of a Randomized Clinical Study of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Plus S-1 as Neoadjuvant Ch… DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15199-8↗
- Paper ASO Author Reflections: Which was the Better Regimen (Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Plus S-1) as N… DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15244-6↗
- Hidenori Takahashi · 3 shared papers, 2021–2024 · strength 0.45
- Paper Results of a Randomized Clinical Study of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Plus S-1 as Neoadjuvant Ch… DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15199-8↗
- Paper ASO Author Reflections: Which was the Better Regimen (Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Plus S-1) as N… DOI 10.1245/s10434-024-15244-6↗
- Paper Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine and nanoparticle albumin-bound … DOI 10.1186/s13063-021-05541-w↗
- Chikato Koga · 2 shared papers, 2022–2026 · strength 0.36
- Masahiro Murakami · 2 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 0.32
- Paper Study protocol: A randomized controlled trial of chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for resec… DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0345459↗
- Paper Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine and nanoparticle albumin-bound … DOI 10.1186/s13063-021-05541-w↗
- Yoshito Tomimaru · 1 shared paper, 2026 · strength 0.22
- Hiroshi Wada · 1 shared paper, 2026 · strength 0.22
- Yoshiteru Katsura · 1 shared paper, 2026 · strength 0.22
- Hidetoshi Eguchi · 1 shared paper, 2025 · strength 0.20
- Masatoshi Inoue · 2 shared papers, 2019–2020 · strength 0.17
- Shoji Nakamori · 2 shared papers, 2016–2018 · strength 0.14
- Atsushi Miyamoto · 2 shared papers, 2016–2018 · strength 0.14
- Mitsugu Sekimoto · 2 shared papers, 2016–2018 · strength 0.14
- Yusuke Akamaru · 1 shared paper, 2022 · strength 0.14
- Rintaro Matsumura · 1 shared paper, 2022 · strength 0.14
- Soichiro Mori · 1 shared paper, 2022 · strength 0.14
- Motohiro Hirao · 1 shared paper, 2016 · strength 0.05
How to reach this person
A chain of introductions through people who have published, run trials or held grants together (warm_path@1: fewest links first, then the strongest). Built from public records only; no contact details are kept.