Pancreatic Cancer Research

ResearcherUniversity of MichiganNo recent work listed

Mahmoud M. Al-Hawary

ORCID-verified (high confidence, 0.95), identity_conf@1As of 8 November 2026

Matched on ORCID iD 0000-0002-3699-1147; OpenAlex author ID A5074668249. Sources: OpenAlex.

Their work

Papers
11 (first author 1, last author 0)
Trials
0
Grants
0
Labs led
0
Collaborators
62
Papers, trials and grants by year

2013: 3 papers · 2014: 3 papers · 2015: none · 2016: 1 paper · 2017: 1 paper · 2018: none · 2019: 1 paper · 2020: none · 2021: 1 paper · 2022: 1 paper

Papers 11

  1. Imaging Assessment of Pancreatic Cancer Resectability After Neoadjuvant Therapy: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. First author DOI 10.2214/ajr.21.26931↗
  2. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Co-author DOI 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0017↗
  3. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 1.2019. Co-author DOI 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0014↗
  4. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Co-author DOI 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0131↗
  5. Role of Imaging in Diagnosing and Staging Pancreatic Cancer. Co-author DOI 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0191↗
  6. A pilot study of diffusion-weighted MRI in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic cancer. Co-author DOI 10.1016/j.tranon.2014.07.005↗
  7. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the society of abdominal radiology and the american pancreatic associatio… Co-author DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.11.004↗
  8. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Associatio… Co-author DOI 10.1148/radiol.13131184↗
  9. Staging of pancreatic cancer: role of imaging. Co-author DOI 10.1053/j.ro.2013.03.005↗
  10. Mimics of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Co-author DOI 10.1102/1470-7330.2013.9012↗
  11. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma staging. Co-author DOI 10.1102/1470-7330.2013.9020↗

Closest collaborators

The 25 strongest of 62 by collab_strength@1: shared papers, trials and grants, recent and small-team work weighing most.

  1. Elliot K. Fishman · 3 shared papers, 2014–2022 · strength 0.26
  2. Isaac R. Francis · 5 shared papers, 2013–2014 · strength 0.25
  3. William G. Hawkins · 3 shared papers, 2017–2021 · strength 0.19
  4. Andrew H. Ko · 3 shared papers, 2017–2021 · strength 0.19
  5. Brian G. Czito · 3 shared papers, 2017–2021 · strength 0.19
  6. Noelle K. LoConte · 3 shared papers, 2017–2021 · strength 0.19
  7. Sushanth Reddy · 3 shared papers, 2017–2021 · strength 0.19
  8. Efrat Dotan · 3 shared papers, 2017–2021 · strength 0.19
  9. Robert A. Wolff · 3 shared papers, 2017–2021 · strength 0.19
  10. Courtney L. Scaife · 3 shared papers, 2017–2021 · strength 0.19
  11. Stephen W. Behrman · 3 shared papers, 2017–2021 · strength 0.19
  12. Eric K. Nakakura · 3 shared papers, 2017–2021 · strength 0.19
  13. Mokenge Peter Malafa · 3 shared papers, 2017–2021 · strength 0.19
  14. Cristina Rosa Ferrone · 3 shared papers, 2017–2021 · strength 0.19
  15. Jeffrey M. Hardacre · 3 shared papers, 2017–2021 · strength 0.19
  16. Brian Matthew Wolpin · 3 shared papers, 2017–2021 · strength 0.19
  17. Dana Backlund Cardin · 3 shared papers, 2017–2021 · strength 0.19
  18. Mary E. Dillhoff · 3 shared papers, 2017–2021 · strength 0.19
  19. Andrew M. Lowy · 3 shared papers, 2017–2021 · strength 0.19
  20. Vincent M. Chung · 3 shared papers, 2017–2021 · strength 0.19
  21. Margaret A. Tempero · 3 shared papers, 2017–2021 · strength 0.19
  22. Al B. Benson · 3 shared papers, 2017–2021 · strength 0.19
  23. Elena Gabriela Chiorean · 3 shared papers, 2017–2021 · strength 0.19
  24. Marc Zins · 1 shared paper, 2022 · strength 0.19
  25. Erik V. Soloff · 1 shared paper, 2022 · strength 0.19

How to reach this person

A chain of introductions through people who have published, run trials or held grants together (warm_path@1: fewest links first, then the strongest). Built from public records only; no contact details are kept.