ResearcherThe Royal Melbourne HospitalActive in the last 2 years
John Raymond Zalcberg
Matched on ORCID iD 0000-0002-6624-0782; OpenAlex author ID A5008173055. Sources: OpenAlex.
Their work
- Papers
- 25 (first author 4, last author 2)
- Trials
- 0
- Grants
- 0
- Labs led
- 1
- Collaborators
- 75
2017: 1 paper · 2018: none · 2019: 1 paper · 2020: 2 papers · 2021: 2 papers · 2022: 6 papers · 2023: 2 papers · 2024: 1 paper · 2025: 6 papers · 2026: 4 papers
Papers 25
- Endoscopic ultrasound molecular evaluation of pancreatic cancer trial to profile molecular landscape of inoperable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Co-author DOI 10.1055/a-2733-1068↗
- Factors Associated With Pancreatectomy Among Australians With Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-Based Study. Co-author DOI 10.1111/ans.70788↗
- Stakeholder Consensus Selection of Data Elements and Indicators for a Pancreatic Cancer Surgical Outcomes Registry in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand: Modif… Co-author DOI 10.1111/ans.70789↗
- The sensitivity of decision support tools for identifying patients with pancreatic cancer: an observational study. Co-author DOI 10.3399/bjgpo.2025.0142↗
- Do routine narrative style CT reports provide sufficient information to adequately stage pancreatic cancer. Co-author DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.05.001↗
- Aiming for high quality of care for completed resections and improved margin status in pancreatic cancer surgery. Last author DOI 10.1016/j.pan.2025.09.029↗
- Relationship between pancreatic cancer resection rate and survival at population level: systematic review. Co-author DOI 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf007↗
- Barriers and hurdles delaying governance approval for an ethically approved nationwide clinical trial in pancreatic cancer. Co-author DOI 10.1111/ans.19296↗
- Re: Simulating the healthcare workforce impact and capacity for pancreatic cancer care in Victoria: a model-based analysis. First author DOI 10.1111/ans.19370↗
- Assessing the impact of an intensive dietitian-led telehealth intervention focusing on nutritional adequacy, symptom control and optional supplemental jejunal … Co-author DOI 10.1186/s12937-025-01113-9↗
- Filling the information void for the benefit of patients: why AANZ need a population-based clinical quality registry for pancreatic cancer surgery. First author DOI 10.1111/ans.19265↗
- Characteristics of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer who access palliative care: An observational study. Co-author DOI 10.1007/s11136-023-03425-x↗
- Determination of "borderline resectable" pancreatic cancer - A global assessment of 30 shades of grey. Co-author DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.07.883↗
- The association between quality care and outcomes for a real-world population of Australian patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Last author DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.11.005↗
- Prognostic models to predict survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. Co-author DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.01.011↗
- National clinical quality registry for pancreatic cancer - the time is nigh. First author DOI 10.1111/ans.17747↗
- Synoptic CT scan reporting of pancreatic adenocarcinoma to align with international consensus guidelines on surgical resectability: a Victorian pilot. Co-author DOI 10.1111/ans.17999↗
- Landscape of clinical trials across the pancreatic cancer care continuum: an Australian perspective. Co-author DOI 10.5694/mja2.51756↗
- Systematic review of the predictors of health service use in pancreatic cancer. Co-author PMID 35261792↗
- EUS-FNA Biopsies to Guide Precision Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer: Results of a Pilot Study to Identify KRAS Wild-Type Tumours for Targeted Therapy. Co-author DOI 10.3389/fonc.2021.770022↗
- The EUS molecular evaluation of pancreatic cancer: A prospective multicenter cohort trial. Co-author DOI 10.4103/eus-d-20-00230↗
- Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. Co-author DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.09.002↗
- Barriers and enablers to the implementation of protocol-based imaging in pancreatic cancer: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework. Co-author DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0243312↗
- Monitoring quality of care for patients with pancreatic cancer: a modified Delphi consensus. Co-author DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.08.016↗
- 3rd St. Gallen EORTC Gastrointestinal Cancer Conference: Consensus recommendations on controversial issues in the primary treatment of pancreatic cancer. First author DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.022↗
Closest collaborators
The 25 strongest of 75 by collab_strength@1: shared papers, trials and grants, recent and small-team work weighing most.
- Charles H. C. Pilgrim · 14 shared papers, 2019–2025 · strength 2.24
- Paper Do routine narrative style CT reports provide sufficient information to adequately stage pancreatic cancer. DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.05.001↗
- Paper Barriers and hurdles delaying governance approval for an ethically approved nationwide clinical trial in pancreatic can… DOI 10.1111/ans.19296↗
- Paper Aiming for high quality of care for completed resections and improved margin status in pancreatic cancer surgery. DOI 10.1016/j.pan.2025.09.029↗
- Daniel Gerald Croagh · 13 shared papers, 2019–2026 · strength 2.05
- Paper National clinical quality registry for pancreatic cancer - the time is nigh. DOI 10.1111/ans.17747↗
- Paper Factors Associated With Pancreatectomy Among Australians With Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-Based Study. DOI 10.1111/ans.70788↗
- Paper Endoscopic ultrasound molecular evaluation of pancreatic cancer trial to profile molecular landscape of inoperable panc… DOI 10.1055/a-2733-1068↗
- Liane Ioannou · 11 shared papers, 2019–2025 · strength 1.71
- Paper National clinical quality registry for pancreatic cancer - the time is nigh. DOI 10.1111/ans.17747↗
- Paper Barriers and hurdles delaying governance approval for an ethically approved nationwide clinical trial in pancreatic can… DOI 10.1111/ans.19296↗
- Paper Aiming for high quality of care for completed resections and improved margin status in pancreatic cancer surgery. DOI 10.1016/j.pan.2025.09.029↗
- Benjamin P. T. Loveday · 4 shared papers, 2024–2026 · strength 1.27
- Paper Re: Simulating the healthcare workforce impact and capacity for pancreatic cancer care in Victoria: a model-based analy… DOI 10.1111/ans.19370↗
- Paper Filling the information void for the benefit of patients: why AANZ need a population-based clinical quality registry fo… DOI 10.1111/ans.19265↗
- Paper Relationship between pancreatic cancer resection rate and survival at population level: systematic review. DOI 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf007↗
- Elizabeth Lockie · 4 shared papers, 2024–2026 · strength 1.27
- Paper Re: Simulating the healthcare workforce impact and capacity for pancreatic cancer care in Victoria: a model-based analy… DOI 10.1111/ans.19370↗
- Paper Filling the information void for the benefit of patients: why AANZ need a population-based clinical quality registry fo… DOI 10.1111/ans.19265↗
- Paper Relationship between pancreatic cancer resection rate and survival at population level: systematic review. DOI 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf007↗
- Sue Evans · 9 shared papers, 2019–2025 · strength 1.22
- Paper Aiming for high quality of care for completed resections and improved margin status in pancreatic cancer surgery. DOI 10.1016/j.pan.2025.09.029↗
- Paper Characteristics of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer who access palliative care: An observational study. DOI 10.1007/s11136-023-03425-x↗
- Paper Landscape of clinical trials across the pancreatic cancer care continuum: an Australian perspective. DOI 10.5694/mja2.51756↗
- Rachel Ε. Neale · 8 shared papers, 2019–2026 · strength 1.15
- Paper Factors Associated With Pancreatectomy Among Australians With Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-Based Study. DOI 10.1111/ans.70788↗
- Paper The sensitivity of decision support tools for identifying patients with pancreatic cancer: an observational study. DOI 10.3399/bjgpo.2025.0142↗
- Paper Aiming for high quality of care for completed resections and improved margin status in pancreatic cancer surgery. DOI 10.1016/j.pan.2025.09.029↗
- Andrew J. Metz · 3 shared papers, 2026 · strength 0.74
- Paper Stakeholder Consensus Selection of Data Elements and Indicators for a Pancreatic Cancer Surgical Outcomes Registry in A… DOI 10.1111/ans.70789↗
- Paper Factors Associated With Pancreatectomy Among Australians With Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-Based Study. DOI 10.1111/ans.70788↗
- Paper The sensitivity of decision support tools for identifying patients with pancreatic cancer: an observational study. DOI 10.3399/bjgpo.2025.0142↗
- Ashika D. Maharaj · 6 shared papers, 2019–2025 · strength 0.70
- Paper Aiming for high quality of care for completed resections and improved margin status in pancreatic cancer surgery. DOI 10.1016/j.pan.2025.09.029↗
- Paper Prognostic models to predict survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.01.011↗
- Paper The association between quality care and outcomes for a real-world population of Australian patients diagnosed with pan… DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.11.005↗
- Neil Donald Merrett · 6 shared papers, 2019–2025 · strength 0.70
- Paper Aiming for high quality of care for completed resections and improved margin status in pancreatic cancer surgery. DOI 10.1016/j.pan.2025.09.029↗
- Paper Prognostic models to predict survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.01.011↗
- Paper The association between quality care and outcomes for a real-world population of Australian patients diagnosed with pan… DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.11.005↗
- Kate White · 6 shared papers, 2019–2025 · strength 0.70
- Paper Aiming for high quality of care for completed resections and improved margin status in pancreatic cancer surgery. DOI 10.1016/j.pan.2025.09.029↗
- Paper Prognostic models to predict survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.01.011↗
- Paper The association between quality care and outcomes for a real-world population of Australian patients diagnosed with pan… DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.11.005↗
- Joanne Lundy · 4 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 0.64
- Paper Endoscopic ultrasound molecular evaluation of pancreatic cancer trial to profile molecular landscape of inoperable panc… DOI 10.1055/a-2733-1068↗
- Paper Assessing the impact of an intensive dietitian-led telehealth intervention focusing on nutritional adequacy, symptom co… DOI 10.1186/s12937-025-01113-9↗
- Paper EUS-FNA Biopsies to Guide Precision Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer: Results of a Pilot Study to Identify KRAS Wild-Type … DOI 10.3389/fonc.2021.770022↗
- James G. Kench · 5 shared papers, 2019–2025 · strength 0.61
- Paper Aiming for high quality of care for completed resections and improved margin status in pancreatic cancer surgery. DOI 10.1016/j.pan.2025.09.029↗
- Paper Prognostic models to predict survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.01.011↗
- Paper The association between quality care and outcomes for a real-world population of Australian patients diagnosed with pan… DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.11.005↗
- Jennifer A. M. Philip · 5 shared papers, 2019–2023 · strength 0.55
- Paper Characteristics of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer who access palliative care: An observational study. DOI 10.1007/s11136-023-03425-x↗
- Paper The association between quality care and outcomes for a real-world population of Australian patients diagnosed with pan… DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.11.005↗
- Paper Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.09.002↗
- Nadia N. Khan · 3 shared papers, 2022–2023 · strength 0.51
- Paper Characteristics of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer who access palliative care: An observational study. DOI 10.1007/s11136-023-03425-x↗
- Paper Landscape of clinical trials across the pancreatic cancer care continuum: an Australian perspective. DOI 10.5694/mja2.51756↗
- Paper Systematic review of the predictors of health service use in pancreatic cancer. PMID 35261792↗
- Brendan John Jenkins · 3 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 0.45
- Paper Endoscopic ultrasound molecular evaluation of pancreatic cancer trial to profile molecular landscape of inoperable panc… DOI 10.1055/a-2733-1068↗
- Paper EUS-FNA Biopsies to Guide Precision Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer: Results of a Pilot Study to Identify KRAS Wild-Type … DOI 10.3389/fonc.2021.770022↗
- Paper The EUS molecular evaluation of pancreatic cancer: A prospective multicenter cohort trial. DOI 10.4103/eus-d-20-00230↗
- John Albert Windsor · 2 shared papers, 2026 · strength 0.45
- Mary A. Waterhouse · 2 shared papers, 2026 · strength 0.45
- David Goldstein · 3 shared papers, 2022–2025 · strength 0.45
- Paper Aiming for high quality of care for completed resections and improved margin status in pancreatic cancer surgery. DOI 10.1016/j.pan.2025.09.029↗
- Paper Prognostic models to predict survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.01.011↗
- Paper The association between quality care and outcomes for a real-world population of Australian patients diagnosed with pan… DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.11.005↗
- David Goldstein · 4 shared papers, 2019–2021 · strength 0.38
- Paper EUS-FNA Biopsies to Guide Precision Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer: Results of a Pilot Study to Identify KRAS Wild-Type … DOI 10.3389/fonc.2021.770022↗
- Paper Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. DOI 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.09.002↗
- Paper Barriers and enablers to the implementation of protocol-based imaging in pancreatic cancer: A qualitative study using t… DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0243312↗
- Luc te Marvelde · 2 shared papers, 2022–2023 · strength 0.35
- Belinda Lee · 2 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 0.33
- Manoop S. Bhutani · 2 shared papers, 2021–2026 · strength 0.33
- Hasna Kazi · 1 shared paper, 2025 · strength 0.33
- Sanjay Pandanaboyana · 1 shared paper, 2025 · strength 0.30
How to reach this person
A chain of introductions through people who have published, run trials or held grants together (warm_path@1: fewest links first, then the strongest). Built from public records only; no contact details are kept.