Clinical trialNAActive not recruiting
Screening for Prostate Cancer in Older Patients (PLCO Screening Trial)
Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial
- Outcome
- Ongoing
- Phase
- NA
- Status
- Active not recruiting
- Study type
- Interventional
- Start
- 16 November 1993
- Expected end
- 30 June 2027
- Enrollment
- 76,685 participants
- Sites
- 1
- Primary outcomes
- Prostate Cancer Deaths; Prostate Cancer Death Rates
- Sponsor
- Nih
- Results posted
- 2014-06-26
- Last update
- 24 July 2026
These are registry fields. A trial card, with population, design, endpoints and result direction each tied to a quote, is not in the data yet.
Ask this document
Answers come only from this document’s own text, as highlighted quotes. If it doesn’t say, you are told so instead of given a guess.
Try
Source text
Brief summary public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
This clinical trial studies whether screening methods used to diagnose cancer of the prostate, lung, colon, rectum, or ovaries can reduce deaths from these cancers. Screening tests may help doctors find cancer cells early and plan better treatment for prostate cancer.
Detailed description public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine whether screening with digital rectal examination (DRE) plus serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) can reduce mortality from prostate cancer in men aged 55-74 at entry. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess screening variables, other than mortality, for each of the interventions including sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value. II. To assess the incidence, stage, and survival of cancer cases. III. To investigate the mortality predictive value of biologic and/or prognostic characterizations of tumor tissue as intermediate endpoints. IV. To conduct biomolecular and genetic research into factors associated with cancer carcinogenesis and promotion, as well as the early detection of these factors. OUTLINE: Participants in the overall PLCO study are stratified by screening center, gender, and age (55-59 vs 60-64 vs 65-69 vs 70-74). Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 arms (control vs screening). ARM I (Control): Participants receive standard medical care. Participants complete a Diet History Questionnaire (DHQ) at baseline. ARM II (Prostate Screening): Participants undergo blood sample collection for PSA analysis at baseline and annually for 5 years. Serum that is not used in the study will be stored in an NCI biorepository. Participants also undergo a DRE at baseline and annually for 3 years. A scheduling and tracking procedure is implemented to ensure regular attendance at repeat screens for participants screened negative or for those who are designated suspicious or positive at screening but for whom subsequent diagnostic procedures do not reveal prostate cancer (follow-up diagnostic procedures are through their own medical care environment). Participants diagnosed with prostate cancer via a screening test are referred for treatment in accordance with current accepted practice for appropriate stage of disease, patient age, and medical condition; a procedure is provided for contact with qualified medical personnel to insure appropriate therapy. Participants complete a Dietary Questionnaire (DQX) at baseline and DHQ at year 3. An Annual Study Update (ADU) (previously referred to as the Periodic Survey of Health \[PSH\] questionnaire) is mailed to each participant annually for 13 years to identify all prevalent and incident prostate cancers as all deaths that occur among both screened and control subjects during the trial. After completion of screening, participants are followed up for at least 13 years.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · primary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Prostate Cancer Deaths [Events through 13 years of follow-up or through December 31, 2009; median follow-up 12.0 years.]. Number, Participants. Control (n=38345): 145; Prostate Screening (n=38340): 158. Analysis, Control vs Prostate Screening: Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.09 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.36); Poisson regression; superiority or other legacy.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Deaths From All Causes [Events through 13 years of follow-up or through December 31, 2009.]. Number, Participants. Control (n=38345): 7089; Prostate Screening (n=38340): 6855.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Death Rates From All Causes [Events through 13 years of follow-up or through December 31, 2009.]. Number, Deaths per 10,000 PY. Control (n=38345): 166.6; Prostate Screening (n=38340): 160.5. Analysis, Control vs Prostate Screening: Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.96 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.00); Poisson regression; superiority or other legacy.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Prostate Cancer Incidence [Events through 13 years of follow-up or through December 31, 2009; median follow-up 12.0 years.]. Number, Participants. Control (n=38345): 3815; Prostate Screening (n=38340): 4250.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Prostate Cancer Incidence Rates [Events through 13 years of follow-up or through December 31, 2009; median follow-up 12.0 years.]. Number, Diagnoses per 10,000 PY. Control (n=38345): 97.1; Prostate Screening (n=38340): 108.4. Analysis, Control vs Prostate Screening: Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.12 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.17); Poisson regression; superiority or other legacy.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Complications of Diagnostic Evaluation (DE) Following a Positive Screening Test [One year from screening examination]. Number, Positive screens w/ complications. When DE Led to Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Prostate Screening (n=10642): 901. When DE Did Not Lead to Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Prostate Screening (n=10642): 124.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
T0 (Baseline) PSA Screening Results [T0 (at study entry)]. Number, Participants. Negative (<=4 ng/mL): Prostate Screening (n=34247): 31507. Positive (> 4 ng/mL): Prostate Screening (n=34247): 2718. Inadequate screen: Prostate Screening (n=34247): 22.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
T0 (Baseline) DRE Screening Results [T0 (at study entry)]. Number, Participants. Negative: Prostate Screening (n=34129): 30456. Positive: Prostate Screening (n=34129): 2481. Inadequate screen: Prostate Screening (n=34129): 1192.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
T1 PSA Screening Results [T1 (one year after entry)]. Number, Participants. Negative (<=4 ng/mL): Prostate Screening (n=32688): 30159. Positive (> 4 ng/mL): Prostate Screening (n=32688): 2502. Inadequate screen: Prostate Screening (n=32688): 27.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
T1 DRE Screening Results [T1 (one year after entry)]. Number, Participants. Negative: Prostate Screening (n=32448): 29311. Positive: Prostate Screening (n=32448): 2237. Inadequate screen: Prostate Screening (n=32448): 900.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
T2 PSA Screening Results [T2 (two years after entry)]. Number, Participants. Negative: Prostate Screening (n=31691): 29063. Positive (> 4 ng/mL): Prostate Screening (n=31691): 2593. Inadequate screen: Prostate Screening (n=31691): 35.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
T2 DRE Screening Results [T2 (two years after entry)]. Number, Participants. Negative: Prostate Screening (n=31451): 28391. Positive: Prostate Screening (n=31451): 2327. Inadequate screen: Prostate Screening (n=31451): 733.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
T3 PSA Screening Results [T3 (three years after entry)]. Number, Participants. Negative (<=4 ng/mL): Prostate Screening (n=30533): 27814. Positive (> 4 ng/mL): Prostate Screening (n=30533): 2676. Inadequate screen: Prostate Screening (n=30533): 43.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
T3 DRE Screening Results [T3 (three years after entry)]. Number, Participants. Negative: Prostate Screening (n=30244): 27179. Positive: Prostate Screening (n=30244): 2317. Inadequate screen: Prostate Screening (n=30244): 748.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · primary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Prostate Cancer Death Rates [Events through 13 years of follow-up or through December 31, 2009; median follow-up 12.0 years.]. Number, Deaths per 10,000 PY. Control (n=38345): 3.4; Prostate Screening (n=38340): 3.7. Analysis, Control vs Prostate Screening: Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.09 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.36); Poisson regression; superiority or other legacy.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
T4 PSA Screening Result [T4 (four years after entry)]. Number, Participants. Negative (<=4 ng/mL): Prostate Screening (n=22170): 20362. Positive (> 4 ng/mL): Prostate Screening (n=22170): 1796. Inadequate screen: Prostate Screening (n=22170): 12.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
T5 PSA Screening Results [T5 (five years after entry)]. Number, Participants. Negative (<=4 ng/mL): Prostate Screening (n=25951): 23560. Positive (> 4 ng/mL): Prostate Screening (n=25951): 2377. Inadequate screen: Prostate Screening (n=25951): 14.
Papers 29
- Builds on itAdherence to the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Recommendatio… DOI 10.1038/s44276-025-00195-6↗
- Builds on itEffects of joint screening for prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer - results from a controlled trial. DOI 10.3389/fonc.2024.1322044↗
- Builds on itBreast Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Relation to Hormone Replacement Therapy Use Among Postmenopausal Women: Result… DOI 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.06.010↗
- Builds on itOpioid and Other Medication Use and General Health Status in a Cohort of Older Adults. DOI 10.1159/000513731↗
- Builds on itVitamin K intake and breast cancer incidence and death: results from a prospective cohort study. DOI 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.11.009↗
- Builds on itOverall mortality in men and women in the randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. DOI 10.1177/0969141319839097↗
- Builds on itAssociation of Nonadherence to Cancer Screening Examinations With Mortality From Unrelated Causes: A Secondary Analysis… DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5982↗
- Builds on itEffect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: long-term follow-up of the ran… DOI 10.1016/s2468-1253(18)30358-3↗
- Builds on itAssociation of Colonoscopy Adenoma Findings With Long-term Colorectal Cancer Incidence. DOI 10.1001/jama.2018.5809↗
- Builds on itIncidence and mortality of colorectal cancer in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer. DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.055↗
- Builds on itSerum biomarkers of habitual coffee consumption may provide insight into the mechanism underlying the association betwe… DOI 10.3945/ajcn.114.096099↗
- Builds on itInterval lung cancers not detected on screening chest X-rays: How are they different? DOI 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.07.013↗
- Builds on itMetabolomics in nutritional epidemiology: identifying metabolites associated with diet and quantifying their potential … DOI 10.3945/ajcn.113.078758↗
- Builds on itGenetic variants reflecting higher vitamin e status in men are associated with reduced risk of prostate cancer. DOI 10.3945/jn.113.189928↗
- Builds on itDiagnostic evaluation following a positive lung screening chest radiograph in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, Ovarian (… DOI 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.07.017↗
- Builds on itRelationship between detection of adenomas by flexible sigmoidoscopy and interval distal colorectal cancer. DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.08.002↗
- Builds on itColorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1114635↗
- Builds on itScreening by chest radiograph and lung cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) randomized … DOI 10.1001/jama.2011.1591↗
- Builds on itEffect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Ran… DOI 10.1001/jama.2011.766↗
- Builds on itThe Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: the prostate cancer screening results in context. DOI 10.3109/0284186x.2010.531283↗
- Builds on itAssessing contamination and compliance in the prostate component of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) … DOI 10.1177/1740774510374091↗
- Builds on itAssociations between anthropometry, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the Prostate, L… DOI 10.1093/aje/kwq085↗
- Builds on itPrediction of true positive lung cancers in individuals with abnormal suspicious chest radiographs: a prostate, lung, c… DOI 10.1097/jto.0b013e31819e77ce↗
- Builds on itCumulative incidence of false-positive results in repeated, multimodal cancer screening. DOI 10.1370/afm.942↗
- Builds on itResults from four rounds of ovarian cancer screening in a randomized trial. DOI 10.1097/aog.0b013e31819cda77↗
- Builds on itMortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. DOI 10.1056/nejmoa0810696↗
- Builds on itBreast cancer epidemiology according to recognized breast cancer risk factors in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ova… DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-9-84↗
- Builds on itFactors associated with human small aggressive non small cell lung cancer. DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-07-0251↗
- Builds on itOvarian cancer screening in women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. DOI 10.1097/01.aog.0000239105.39149.d8↗