Pancreatic Cancer Research

Clinical trialPhase 3Completed

S0205 Gemcitabine w/ or w/o Cetuximab as First-Line Therapy in Locally Advanced Pancreas Cancer

A Phase III Randomized Open-Label Study Comparing Gemcitabine Plus Cetuximab (IMC-C225) Versus Gemcitabine As First-Line Therapy Of Patients With Advanced Pancreas Cancer

NCT00075686↗ ClinicalTrials.gov, retrieved 6 November 2026

Outcome
Finished, no results posted
Phase
Phase 3
Status
Completed
Study type
Interventional
Start
January 2004
Expected end
April 2009
Enrollment
766 participants
Sites
389
Primary outcomes
Overall survival comparison between treatment groups
Sponsor
Network
Results posted
No
Last update
17 November 2015

These are registry fields. A trial card, with population, design, endpoints and result direction each tied to a quote, is not in the data yet.

Ask this document

Answers come only from this document’s own text, as highlighted quotes. If it doesn’t say, you are told so instead of given a guess.

Try

Source text

Brief summary public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine, work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab, can locate tumor cells and either kill them or deliver tumor-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. It is not yet known whether gemcitabine is more effective with or without cetuximab in treating pancreatic cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying giving gemcitabine together with cetuximab to see how well it works compared to giving gemcitabine alone as first-line therapy in treating patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Detailed description public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)

OBJECTIVES: * Compare the overall survival of patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated with gemcitabine and cetuximab vs gemcitabine alone. * Compare the time to treatment failure in patients treated with these regimens. * Estimate the percentage of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tumor expression in patients treated with these regimens. * Compare the overall survival of patients in the EGFR-positive subset treated with these regimens. * Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients. * Compare the total response rate (confirmed and unconfirmed complete and partial response) in patients with measurable disease treated with these regimens. * Compare the patient report of pain and quality of life of patients treated with these regimens. OUTLINE: This is an open-label, randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to disease status (locally advanced unresectable vs metastatic), Zubrod performance status (0 or 1 vs 2), and prior pancreatectomy (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. * Arm I: Patients receive cetuximab IV over 1-2 hours on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 and gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 for course 1 and days 1, 8, and 15 for all subsequent courses. * Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine as in arm I. In both arms, courses repeat every 4 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, before each course, and at the end of study therapy. Patients are followed every 6 months for 2 years and then annually for 1 year. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 704 patients (352 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 5 years.

Papers 1

The registry lists these as results papers; in a hand check of 27 such links about 78% reported the trial’s results, so read the paper before treating it as the outcome.