Clinical trialPhase 1 / Phase 2Completed
Study of CAP1-6D in Patients With Locally Advanced or Surgically Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
A Randomized Pilot Phase II Study of Immunization With Modified CEA (CAP1-6D) Peptide In Patients With Locally Advanced Or Surgically Resected Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas
- Outcome
- Outcome unknown
- Phase
- Phase 1 / Phase 2
- Status
- Completed
- Study type
- Interventional
- Start
- April 2003
- Expected end
- May 2012
- Enrollment
- 23 participants
- Sites
- 1
- Primary outcomes
- Maximum T Cell Response From Baseline
- Sponsor
- Other
- Results posted
- 2014-03-14
- Last update
- 16 April 2014
These are registry fields. A trial card, with population, design, endpoints and result direction each tied to a quote, is not in the data yet.
Ask this document
Answers come only from this document’s own text, as highlighted quotes. If it doesn’t say, you are told so instead of given a guess.
Try
Source text
Brief summary public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the experimental vaccine "modified CEA peptide CAP 1 -6D" (mCEA) can produce an immune response in patients with pancreatic cancer who have received chemotherapy and radiation therapy.
Detailed description public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
PC has a dismal prognosis. Despite surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, most patients with PC will die of distant metastatic disease. Peptide vaccine approaches offer an attractive potential treatment option. Since CEA is expressed in \>90% of PC, it would make an attractive target for a vaccination approach. Several different vaccination approaches have been tested using CEA as a TAA. Although some investigators suggest that DC-based approaches are the most active, they are limited by the need to obtain patient-specific DCs. One attractive approach would be to add GM-CSF to the peptide to recruit endogenous DC to the site of vaccination. There are data on the use of tumor vaccines in advanced PC. Gjerertsen et al. used a K Ras peptide and GM-CSF in 48 patients with advanced PC. 50% of patients showed a peptide specific CTL response (Gjertsen, Buanes et al. 2001). Those that had an immune response had an increased overall survival, The data from phase I and II clinical trials was based on heavily pretreated patients with metastatic disease. The majority of clinical responses have been disease stabilization. The data in B cell lymphoma vaccines suggests that immune responses are more likely to be generated in minimum disease states (Bendandi, Gocke et al. 1999). For patients that have had a complete resection and treatment with adjuvant chemoradiation, and for patients with locally advanced nonresectable disease treated with standard chemoradiation, there is presently no therapy available to decrease the chance of disease reoccurrence. Our hypothesis is that immunization with a modified CEA peptide in Montanide/GM-CSF can lead to expansion of CEA-reactive CTL and result in control of CEA expressing pancreatic carcinomas.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · primary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Maximum T Cell Response From Baseline [baseline and every 4 weeks on treatment]. Median, spots per 10^4 CD8+ cells (Full Range). A: CEA Peptide 10mcg (n=5): 10.5 (0 to 155); B: CEA Peptide 100 mcg (n=5): 51.75 (-16 to 432.5); C: CEA Peptide 1000mcg (n=4): 270.625 (72.25 to 377.25). Analysis, A: CEA Peptide 10mcg vs C: CEA Peptide 1000mcg: p=0.028; Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney); superiority or other.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Evidence of Dose Limiting Toxicities of Immunization With Modified CEA (Carcinoembryonic Antigen) Peptide. [participants were followed while they were on study treatment, a median of 8 weeks]. Number, participants. A: CEA Peptide 10mcg (n=5): 0; B: CEA Peptide 100 mcg (n=8): 0; C: CEA Peptide 1000mcg (n=6): 0. Analysis, A: CEA Peptide 10mcg vs B: CEA Peptide 100 mcg vs C: CEA Peptide 1000mcg: p=>0.99; Fisher Exact; superiority or other.