Clinical trialPhase 2Completed
AZD6244 vs. Capecitabine (Xeloda®) in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer, Who Have Failed First Line Gemcitabine Therapy
A Phase II, Open, Randomised Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of AZD6244 vs. Capecitabine (Xeloda®) in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer, Who Have Failed First Line Gemcitabine Therapy
- Outcome
- Finished, no results posted
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Status
- Completed
- Study type
- Interventional
- Start
- August 2006
- Expected end
- October 2008
- Enrollment
- 70 participants
- Sites
- 17
- Primary outcomes
- Median time to death (TTD)
- Sponsor
- Industry
- Results posted
- No
- Last update
- 13 August 2014
These are registry fields. A trial card, with population, design, endpoints and result direction each tied to a quote, is not in the data yet.
Ask this document
Answers come only from this document’s own text, as highlighted quotes. If it doesn’t say, you are told so instead of given a guess.
Try
Source text
Brief summary public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of AZD6244 (ARRY-142886)versus capecitabine in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer who have failed first-line therapy with gemcitabine. Following baseline assessments, a minimum of 64 patients in approximately 5-6 centers from the US will be treated with either AZD6244 or capecitabine. Treatment will be continued for as long as the patients receive clinical benefit. The status of all patients will be checked (whether they are still taking treatment or not) approximately 3 months after the last patient has entered the study.
Papers 1
- Registry-listed results paperA phase II open-label randomized study to assess the efficacy and safety of selumetinib (AZD6244 [ARRY-142886]) versus … DOI 10.1007/s10637-011-9687-4↗
The registry lists these as results papers; in a hand check of 27 such links about 78% reported the trial’s results, so read the paper before treating it as the outcome.