Clinical trialPhase 2Completed
A Dose-Escalation to Rash Study of Tarceva (Erlotinib) Plus Gemcitabine in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
A Randomized, Open-label, Dose-escalation to Rash Study to Assess the Effect of Tarceva in Combination With Gemcitabine on Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.
- Outcome
- Outcome unknown
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Status
- Completed
- Study type
- Interventional
- Start
- May 2008
- Expected end
- February 2012
- Enrollment
- 467 participants
- Sites
- 89
- Primary outcomes
- Percentage of Participants Who Died Assessed From Point of Randomization; OS Assessed From Point of Randomization
- Sponsor
- Industry
- Results posted
- 2015-02-11
- Last update
- 11 February 2015
These are registry fields. A trial card, with population, design, endpoints and result direction each tied to a quote, is not in the data yet.
Ask this document
Answers come only from this document’s own text, as highlighted quotes. If it doesn’t say, you are told so instead of given a guess.
Try
Source text
Brief summary public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
This study will compare the efficacy and safety of escalating versus standard doses to rash of Tarceva, in combination with gemcitabine, in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. During a 4 week run-in period, all patients will receive Tarceva 100mg/day po plus gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 iv on days 1, 8,15 and 22. After 4 weeks, patients who have not developed rash, or only develop grade 1 rash, will be randomized to one of 2 groups. Group 1 will receive a starting dose of Tarceva 150mg po daily, increased in steps of 50mg every 2 weeks up to a maximum of 250mg/day po, until development of grade 2 rash or other dose-limiting toxicity. Group 2 will continue to receive Tarceva 100mg/day po. All patients will continue to receive gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 iv on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 4 week cycle. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · primary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Percentage of Participants Who Died Assessed From Point of Randomization [Randomization [Day 1 of Cycle 2 (4-week cycles)] and weekly thereafter for up to 46 months.]. Number, percentage of participants. G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=75): 81.3; G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=70): 85.7.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · primary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
OS Assessed From Point of Randomization [Randomization [Day 1 of Cycle 2 (4-week cycles)] and weekly thereafter for up to 46 months.]. Median, months (95% Confidence Interval). G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=75): 8.4 (6.4 to 10.0); G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=70): 7.0 (5.8 to 8.3). Analysis, G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2 vs G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2: Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.26 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.80); p=0.2026; Log Rank; superiority or other.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death as Assessed From Point of Randomization [Randomization [Day 1 of Cycle 2 (4-week cycles)] and weekly thereafter for up to 46 months.]. Number, percentage of participants. G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=75): 90.7; G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=70): 88.6.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
PFS Assessed From Point of Randomization [Randomization [Day 1 of Cycle 2 (4-week cycles)] and weekly thereafter for up to 46 months.]. Median, weeks (95% Confidence Interval). G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=75): 19.4 (16.0 to 26.9); G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=70): 15.3 (11.3 to 19.1). Analysis, G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2 vs G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2: Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.09 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.54); p=0.6298; Log Rank; superiority or other.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST [BL, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression for up to 46 months.]. Number, percentage of participants (95% Confidence Interval). G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=75): 14.7 (7.6 to 24.7); G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=70): 8.6 (3.2 to 17.7). Analysis, G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2 vs G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2: Difference in Response Rates -6.10 (95% CI -17.2 to 5.0); p=0.2543; Chi-squared; superiority or other. Analysis, G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2 vs G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2: Odds Ratio (OR) 0.55 (95% CI 0.19 to 1.56); superiority or other.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Percentage of Participants With a CR, PR, Stable Disease (SD), or PD According to RECIST [BL, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression for up to 46 months.]. Number, percentage of participants (95% Confidence Interval). CR: G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=75): 0.0 (0.0 to 4.8); G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=70): 1.4 (0.0 to 7.7). PR: G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=75): 14.7 (7.6 to 24.7); G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=70): 7.1 (2.4 to 15.9). SD: G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=75): 58.7 (46.7 to 69.9); G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=70): 72.9 (60.9 to 82.8). PD: G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=75): 25.3 (16.0 to 36.7); G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=70): 12.9 (6.1 to 23.0). Missing (no response assessment): G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=75): 1.3 (NA to NA) [95% CI was not determined for missing responses.]; G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=70): 5.7 (NA to NA) [95% CI was not determined for missing responses.].
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Percentage of Participants With SD (Maintained for at Least 8 Weeks) or CR or PR (Maintained for at Least 4 Weeks) According to RECIST [BL, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression for up to 46 months.]. Number, percentage of participants (95% Confidence Interval). G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=75): 62.7 (50.7 to 73.6); G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=70): 47.1 (35.1 to 59.4). Analysis, G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2 vs G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2: Difference in Disease Control Rates -15.52 (95% CI -32.4 to 1.3); p=0.0603; Chi-squared; superiority or other.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Percentage of Participants Who Died as Assessed From Start of 4-Week Run-In [BL and weekly thereafter for up to 46 months.]. Number, percentage of participants. G+E: Rash ≥ Grade 2 (n=106): 84.9; G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=75): 81.3; G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=70): 85.7.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
OS Assessed From Start of 4-Week Run-In [BL and weekly thereafter for up to 46 months.]. Median, months (95% Confidence Interval). G+E: Rash ≥ Grade 2 (n=106): 7.9 (7.1 to 8.8); G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=75): 9.3 (7.3 to 10.9); G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=70): 8.0 (6.8 to 9.2). Analysis, G+E: Rash ≥ Grade 2 vs G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2: Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.83 (95% CI 0.60 to 1.15); p=0.2678; Log Rank; superiority or other. Analysis, G+E: Rash ≥ Grade 2 vs G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2: Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.03 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.43); p=0.8449; Log Rank; superiority or other.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death as Assessed From the Start of 4-Week Run-In [BL, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression or death for up to 46 months.]. Number, percentage of participants. G+E: Rash ≥ Grade 2 (n=106): 90.6; G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=75): 90.7; G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=70): 88.6.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
PFS Assessed From the Start of 4-Week Run-In [BL, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression or death for up to 46 months.]. Median, weeks (95% Confidence Interval). G+E: Rash ≥ Grade 2 (n=96): 17.1 (16.0 to 22.7); G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=68): 23.4 (20.0 to 31.0); G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2 (n=62): 19.3 (15.3 to 23.1). Analysis, G+E: Rash ≥ Grade 2 vs G+E Standard Dose: Rash Grade < 2: Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.69 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.95); p=0.0217; Log Rank; superiority or other. Analysis, G+E: Rash ≥ Grade 2 vs G+E Escalating Dose: Rash Grade < 2: Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.79 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.10); p=0.1596; Log Rank; superiority or other.
Papers 1
- Registry-listed results paperDose escalation to rash for erlotinib plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer: the phase II RACHEL study. DOI 10.1038/bjc.2014.494↗
The registry lists these as results papers; in a hand check of 27 such links about 78% reported the trial’s results, so read the paper before treating it as the outcome.