Clinical trialPhase 2Completed
Safety and Efficacy Study of Gemcitabine-erlotinib Versus Gemcitabine-erlotinib-capecitabine in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
A Phase IIb Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Gemcitabine-erlotinib Versus Gemcitabine-erlotinib-capecitabine in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
- Outcome
- Finished, no results posted
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Status
- Completed
- Study type
- Interventional
- Start
- February 2011
- Expected end
- June 2015
- Enrollment
- 120 participants
- Sites
- 1
- Primary outcomes
- Progression free survival
- Sponsor
- Other
- Results posted
- No
- Last update
- 1 August 2017
These are registry fields. A trial card, with population, design, endpoints and result direction each tied to a quote, is not in the data yet.
Ask this document
Answers come only from this document’s own text, as highlighted quotes. If it doesn’t say, you are told so instead of given a guess.
Try
Source text
Brief summary public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine-erlotinib versus gemcitabine-erlotinib-capecitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Papers 1
- Registry-listed results paperGemcitabine-erlotinib versus gemcitabine-erlotinib-capecitabine in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic… DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.12.032↗
The registry lists these as results papers; in a hand check of 27 such links about 78% reported the trial’s results, so read the paper before treating it as the outcome.