Clinical trialObsCompleted
Comparison Between Base and Cover Slide From Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Pancreatic Cancer
Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy Between Base and Cover Slide Smear After Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Pancreatic Cancer
- Outcome
- Finished, no results posted
- Phase
- Obs
- Status
- Completed
- Study type
- Observational
- Start
- June 2014
- Expected end
- March 2016
- Enrollment
- 73 participants
- Sites
- 1
- Primary outcomes
- positive malignancy rate of cover slides set and base slides set.
- Sponsor
- Other
- Results posted
- No
- Last update
- 27 May 2016
These are registry fields. A trial card, with population, design, endpoints and result direction each tied to a quote, is not in the data yet.
Ask this document
Answers come only from this document’s own text, as highlighted quotes. If it doesn’t say, you are told so instead of given a guess.
Try
Source text
Brief summary public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a difference of diagnostic accuracy between cover slides and base slides from EUS-FNA cytopathologic sample in patients who were previously suspected of pancreatic cancer in radiologic test.
Detailed description public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
1. background 1. Pancreatic cancer is the challenging malignancy in diagnosis and treatment. 2. Recently, EUS-FNA has played a important role in diagnosing pancreatic cancer. 3. Samples from EUS-FNA are sent to following three types of preparations. * cytologic smear (by pull apart method) * cell block * histologic biopsy 4. In cytologic smear method, endoscopists tend to send as many as slides, while pathologists want minimal slides if they warrant diagnostic accuracy. 5. Therefore we are going to find a point of contact between high diagnostic yield and minimal overloading of pathologist. 2. Method 1. We are going to enrolled the patients who were suspected of pancreatic cancer in previous radiologic test. 2. One identical and skilled endoscopist performs EUS-FNA with multiple punctures. 3. We get total 8 pairs of slides (= 8 covers + 8 bases). 4. All the cover slides are collected to the bottle-A, all the base slide to the bottle-B. 5. One identical and skilled pathologist inspects these slide in blind method. (She cannot show the label of bottle so that she does not know what bottle is A or B.) 6. She record the positive or negative in each bottle. (If there is only one slide is positive in malignant cell, the bottle is positive.) 7. In these manner, we collect the all subjects' cytopathologic results as a pair of outcome. All the possible combinations are following four examples: * (cover/base) = (positive/positive) = (+/+) * (cover/base) = (positive/negative) = (+/-) * (cover/base) = (negative/positive) = (-/+) * (cover/base) = (negative/negative) = (-/-) 8. Then we are going to take a two-sided non-inferiority test of proportion using McNemar's test.