Clinical trialPhase 2 / Phase 3Terminated
A Study Evaluating Lanreotide as Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Non-Resectable Duodeno-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (REMINET)
A EUROPEAN, MULTICENTRE, PHASE II/III RANDOMISED DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO CONTROLLED STUDY EVALUATING LANREOTIDE AS MAINTENANCE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH NON-RESECTABLE DUODENO-PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOURS AFTER FIRST-LINE TREATMENT
- Outcome
- Stopped earlyBecause of slow recruitment (Enrollment)
- Phase
- Phase 2 / Phase 3
- Status
- Terminated
- Study type
- Interventional
- Start
- January 2015
- Expected end
- January 2020
- Enrollment
- 53 participants
- Sites
- 24
- Primary outcomes
- Proportion of Patients Alive and Progression-free at 6 Months
- Sponsor
- Other
- Results posted
- 2021-10-04
- Last update
- 18 January 2023
These are registry fields. A trial card, with population, design, endpoints and result direction each tied to a quote, is not in the data yet.
Ask this document
Answers come only from this document’s own text, as highlighted quotes. If it doesn’t say, you are told so instead of given a guess.
Try
Source text
Brief summary public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
This European, prospective, multicentre, double-blind randomised study will evaluate the effect of lanreotide (120 mg every 28 days until disease progression) versus placebo in patients with metastatic/locally advanced, non-resectable, duodeno-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.
Detailed description public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
This is a European, prospective, multicentre, double-blind randomised study evaluating lanreotide (120 mg every 28 days until disease progression) versus placebo in patients with metastatic/locally advanced, non-resectable, duodeno-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Depending on the phase II results, the study may be continued into phase III. The treatment and follow-up of patients will be the same in phase II and phase III. After the first-line treatment, patients will be randomly assigned with a 1:1 ratio to receive either lanreotide or placebo. The study treatment should be initiated within 6 weeks following the confirmation date of stable disease or objective response. Treatment period: For each patient, the investigational products (lanreotide or placebo) will be provided according to a double-blind procedure until disease progression or toxicity, in accordance with the protocol. The estimated average treatment duration for all patients is 12 months. Follow-up period: To evaluate overall survival, patients in phase II will have a minimum follow-up period of 12 months; if the study continues to phase III, these patients will have a maximum follow-up period of 10 years. Phase III patients will have a minimum follow-up period of 5 years.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · primary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Proportion of Patients Alive and Progression-free at 6 Months [6 months]. Count Of Participants, Participants. Placebo (n=24): 13; Lanreotide (n=26): 19.
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Progression-Free Survival [up to 2 years]. Median, Months (95% Confidence Interval). Placebo (n=25): 7.6 (3.0 to 9.0); Lanreotide (n=27): 19.4 (7.6 to 32.6).
Posted results (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) · secondary outcome public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Overall Survival [2 years after the end of the treatment]. Number, Percentage of patients alive (95% Confidence Interval). Placebo (n=25): 86.1 (62.1 to 95.4); Lanreotide (n=27): 95.0 (69.5 to 99.3).
Papers 3
- Registry-listed results paperLanreotide as maintenance therapy after first-line treatment in patients with non-resectable duodeno-pancreatic neuroen… DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.07.033↗
- Registry-listed results paperEvaluating lanreotide as maintenance therapy after first-line treatment in patients with non-resectable duodeno-pancrea… DOI 10.1016/j.dld.2017.02.004↗
- BackgroundHomology between clindamycin resistance plasmids in Bacteroides. DOI 10.1016/0147-619x(84)90035-0↗
The registry lists these as results papers; in a hand check of 27 such links about 78% reported the trial’s results, so read the paper before treating it as the outcome.