Clinical trialNACompleted
Minimally Invasive Pancreatico-duodenectomy
Comparative Study Between Minimally Invasive Pancreatico-duodenectomy and Open Pancreatico-duodenectomy for Periampullary Tumors
- Outcome
- Finished, no results posted
- Phase
- NA
- Status
- Completed
- Study type
- Interventional
- Start
- May 2016
- Expected end
- June 2018
- Enrollment
- 40 participants
- Sites
- 0
- Primary outcomes
- duration of hospital stay
- Sponsor
- Other
- Results posted
- No
- Last update
- 3 March 2021
These are registry fields. A trial card, with population, design, endpoints and result direction each tied to a quote, is not in the data yet.
Ask this document
Answers come only from this document’s own text, as highlighted quotes. If it doesn’t say, you are told so instead of given a guess. Only its metadata is loaded so far, so most questions will be declined.
Try
Papers 6
- Registry-listed results paperThe role of robotics in widening the range of application of minimally invasive surgery for pancreaticoduodenectomy. DOI 10.1016/j.pan.2015.12.007↗
- BackgroundLong-term results of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary cancer-experience of 130 cas… DOI 10.1089/lap.2014.0502↗
- BackgroundDelayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, predictors of severity and outcome. A single cent… DOI 10.1007/s11605-015-2795-2↗
- BackgroundLaparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy should not be routine for resection of periampullary tumors. DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.052↗
- BackgroundTotal laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approac… DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000000937↗
- BackgroundPancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single… DOI 10.1007/s00268-013-1998-5↗
The registry lists these as results papers; in a hand check of 27 such links about 78% reported the trial’s results, so read the paper before treating it as the outcome.