Pancreatic Cancer Research

Clinical trialPhase 3Completed

2nd-line Therapy With Nal-IRI After Gem/Nab-pac in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer - Predictive Role of 1st-line Therapy

Second-line Therapy With Nal-IRI After Failure Gemcitabine/Nab-paclitaxel in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer - Predictive Role of 1st-line Therapy

Outcome
Finished, no results posted
Phase
Phase 3
Status
Completed
Study type
Interventional
Start
31 March 2018
Expected end
31 May 2022
Enrollment
151 participants
Sites
35
Primary outcomes
Time to Treatment Failure of second-line treatment (TTF2)
Sponsor
Other
Results posted
No
Last update
17 April 2025

These are registry fields. A trial card, with population, design, endpoints and result direction each tied to a quote, is not in the data yet.

Ask this document

Answers come only from this document’s own text, as highlighted quotes. If it doesn’t say, you are told so instead of given a guess.

Try

Source text

Brief summary public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Second-line therapy with Nal-IRI after failure gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in advanced pancreatic cancer - predictive role of 1st-line therapy

Detailed description public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Research hypothesis: Patients profit from 2nd-line therapy with Nal-IRI if they also had a benefit from 1st-line treatment. Benefit from treatment (either 1st or 2nd-line) will be defined as a patient specific Time-To-Treatment Failure (TTF) which is in the upper third of the distribution of TTF values of the studied population.