Clinical trialPhase 3Completed
2nd-line Therapy With Nal-IRI After Gem/Nab-pac in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer - Predictive Role of 1st-line Therapy
Second-line Therapy With Nal-IRI After Failure Gemcitabine/Nab-paclitaxel in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer - Predictive Role of 1st-line Therapy
- Outcome
- Finished, no results posted
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Status
- Completed
- Study type
- Interventional
- Start
- 31 March 2018
- Expected end
- 31 May 2022
- Enrollment
- 151 participants
- Sites
- 35
- Primary outcomes
- Time to Treatment Failure of second-line treatment (TTF2)
- Sponsor
- Other
- Results posted
- No
- Last update
- 17 April 2025
These are registry fields. A trial card, with population, design, endpoints and result direction each tied to a quote, is not in the data yet.
Ask this document
Answers come only from this document’s own text, as highlighted quotes. If it doesn’t say, you are told so instead of given a guess.
Try
Source text
Brief summary public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Second-line therapy with Nal-IRI after failure gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in advanced pancreatic cancer - predictive role of 1st-line therapy
Detailed description public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Research hypothesis: Patients profit from 2nd-line therapy with Nal-IRI if they also had a benefit from 1st-line treatment. Benefit from treatment (either 1st or 2nd-line) will be defined as a patient specific Time-To-Treatment Failure (TTF) which is in the upper third of the distribution of TTF values of the studied population.
Papers 2
- Builds on itPredictive criteria for overall survival and treatment duration of 2nd-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced panc… DOI 10.1038/s41416-025-03188-x↗
- Builds on itAn immune responsive tumor microenvironment imprints into PBMCs and predicts outcome in advanced pancreatic cancer: les… DOI 10.1186/s12943-025-02406-7↗