Clinical trialObsUnknown
Comparison Of Radiation Exposure To Patients During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Performed By Endoscopists Trained In Judicious Use Of Fluoroscopy With Those Without Formal Training
Comparison Of Radiation Exposure To Patients During ERCPs Performed By Endoscopists Trained In Judicious Use Of Fluoroscopy With Those Without Formal Training
- Outcome
- Outcome unknown
- Phase
- Obs
- Status
- Unknown
- Study type
- Observational
- Start
- November 2015
- Expected end
- December 2025
- Enrollment
- 1,000 participants
- Sites
- 1
- Primary outcomes
- Radiation exposure as assessed by fluoroscopy time; Radiation exposure as assessed by total emittance
- Sponsor
- Other
- Results posted
- No
- Last update
- 12 January 2021
These are registry fields. A trial card, with population, design, endpoints and result direction each tied to a quote, is not in the data yet.
Ask this document
Answers come only from this document’s own text, as highlighted quotes. If it doesn’t say, you are told so instead of given a guess.
Try
Source text
Brief summary public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Purpose: To compare the radiation exposure in patients during Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) done by Endoscopists formally trained in judicious use of fluoroscopy versus ERCPs done by Endoscopists without such formal training. Research design: This is an observational study to compare radiation exposure in patients during ERCPs based on formal training. Procedures to be used: None Risks and potential benefits There are no risks associated with this study as it is a retrospective chart review. Potential benefits include the knowledge gained from this study which may be of help to patients in the future. Importance of knowledge that may reasonably be expected to result The knowledge gained from this study may be of help to provide new insights and develop newer guidelines for radiation use in the future.