Pancreatic Cancer Research

Clinical trialPhase 2Active not recruiting

Systemic Therapy With or Without Local Consolidative Therapy in Treating Patients With Oligometastatic Solid Tumor

External Beam Radiation to Eliminate Nominal Metastatic Disease (EXTEND): A Randomized Phase II Basket Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Upfront Local Consolidative Therapy (LCT) for Oligometastatic Disease

Outcome
Ongoing
Phase
Phase 2
Status
Active not recruiting
Study type
Interventional
Start
31 July 2018
Expected end
31 December 2029
Enrollment
380 participants
Sites
12
Primary outcomes
Incidence of adverse events; Progression free survival; Time to development of new distant metastases; Overall survival
Sponsor
Other
Results posted
No
Last update
12 June 2026

These are registry fields. A trial card, with population, design, endpoints and result direction each tied to a quote, is not in the data yet.

Ask this document

Answers come only from this document’s own text, as highlighted quotes. If it doesn’t say, you are told so instead of given a guess.

Try

Source text

Brief summary public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)

This phase II trial studies how well systemic therapy with or without local consolidative therapy work in treating patients with solid tumor that has spread to 1 site of other places in the body. Treatment with up-front local consolidative therapy may be better in helping to control the disease.

Detailed description public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. In patients with oligometastatic malignancies, to assess PFS with upfront LCT vs. no LCT among randomized patients. In this analysis each disease site will be analyzed separately. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. In patients with oligometastatic malignancies, to assess OS with upfront LCT vs. no LCT among randomized patients. In this analysis disease sites will be amalgamated and analysis will compare randomized arms. II. In patients with oligometastatic malignancies, to assess time to next line systemic therapy with upfront LCT vs. no LCT. The subsequent line of systemic therapy will be defined as the subsequent line after protocol specified systemic therapy. III. In patients with oligometastatic malignancies, to assess time to new lesion failure with upfront LCT vs. no LCT. IV. To assess safety/tolerability of upfront LCT in patients with oligometastatic malignancies. V. In patients with oligometastatic malignancies, to assess quality of life with upfront LCT vs. no LCT. Separate analyses will assess 1) all disease sites amalgamated and 2) all disease sites analyzed separately. VI. In patients with oligometastatic malignancies, assess time to local failure with upfront LCT vs no LCT. VII. In patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer, assess radiographic progression-free survival with upfront LCT vs no LCT. VIII. In patients with oligometastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer, assess castrateresistance free survival with upfront LCT vs no LCT. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To identify predictive/prognostic biomarkers that are associated with a benefit to LCT across disease sites. II. To investigate alterations in biomarker profile over time and in response to radiation delivery. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive up-front standard of care LCT including but not limited to surgical resection, cryotherapy, and radiofrequency ablation. Patients then receive routine drug therapy. ARM II: Patients receive routine drug therapy. Patients may later receive LCT at the discretion of doctor. After completion of study, patients are followed up every 18 weeks.