Pancreatic Cancer Research

Clinical trialNAUnknown

Two-in-one Covered and Uncovered Metal Stent

Feasibility and Safety of a Newly Developed Two-in-one Covered and Uncovered Metal Stent for Inoperable Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction

Outcome
Outcome unknown
Phase
NA
Status
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Start
1 May 2016
Expected end
31 December 2021
Enrollment
100 participants
Sites
2
Primary outcomes
Cumulative patency of inner covered stent and Two-in-one stent
Sponsor
Other
Results posted
No
Last update
21 July 2021

These are registry fields. A trial card, with population, design, endpoints and result direction each tied to a quote, is not in the data yet.

Ask this document

Answers come only from this document’s own text, as highlighted quotes. If it doesn’t say, you are told so instead of given a guess.

Try

Source text

Brief summary public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Endoscopic placement of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) is the principle method for palliation of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction. However, none of bare, covered, and anti-reflux metal stent alone constantly demonstrated superiority over the others in the stent patency. To compensate for the limitations of each stent, a double stent system in which both covered and bare SEMSs are integrated into one stent system was introduced. In the current study, the investigators aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this stent in patients with inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction.

Detailed description public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Endoscopic placement of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) is the principle method for palliation of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction. As the survival time for those patients has improved due mainly in part to development of chemotherapeutic intervention, it is becoming important to prevent recurrent cholangitis and liver failure by prolonging the SEMS patency, leading to continuation of chemotherapy and better prognosis. Therefore, one-time stent insertion before disease-progression-related death is an ultimate goal of developing an ideal biliary stent. SEMSs have been found to be superior to plastic stents in terms of the stent patency, because it prevent accumulation of biliary sludge owing to larger diameter. The ideal designs of biliary SEMSs for prolongation of the stent patency include 1) bare metal mesh for tissue embedding to prevent stent migration, 2) covering material to counteract neoplastic tumor ingrowth, and 3) anti-reflux structure to reduce enteric biliary reflux. However, none of bare, covered, and anti-reflux metal stent alone constantly demonstrated superiority over the others in the stent patency. To compensate for the limitations of each stent, a double stent system in which both covered and bare SEMSs are integrated into one stent system was introduced in the field of the interventional radiology, but further data accumulation is needed to assess the comparability with various conventional SEMS types in terms of stent patency, reintervention efficacy, and clinical outcomes following reintervention, because in this system two metal stents are implanted at once exclusively via percutaneous route and clogged inner covered stent cannot be removed at the time of the reintervention. Recently a new covered and uncovered SEMS in which the clogged inner stent can be endoscopically removed leaving the outer stent in place, was introduced. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this stent in patients with inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction.