Pancreatic Cancer Research

Clinical trialObsUnknown

Surgical Results of Resection of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Surgical Outcome of Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Upfront Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (Single Center Experience)

Outcome
Outcome unknown
Phase
Obs
Status
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Start
5 January 2024
Expected end
October 2025
Enrollment
80 participants
Sites
0
Primary outcomes
Mortality
Sponsor
Other
Results posted
No
Last update
16 January 2024

These are registry fields. A trial card, with population, design, endpoints and result direction each tied to a quote, is not in the data yet.

Ask this document

Answers come only from this document’s own text, as highlighted quotes. If it doesn’t say, you are told so instead of given a guess.

Try

Source text

Brief summary public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)

The aim is to compare the surgical outcomes between upfront surgery and surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in terms of morbidity and mortality

Detailed description public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States. While surgical resection remains the only curative option, more than 80% of patients present with unresectable disease. Unfortunately, even among those who undergo resection, the reported median survival is 15-23 mo, with a 5-year survival of approximately 20%. Disappointingly, over the past several decades, despite improvements in diagnostic imaging, surgical technique and chemotherapeutic options, only modest improvements in survival have been realized. Nevertheless, it remains clear that surgical resection is a prerequisite for achieving long-term survival and cure. The concept of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer has evolved from several clinical observations made over decades. It has been recognized for some time that the prognosis for patients undergoing surgical resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is highly dependent on margin status, with total gross excision and histologically negative margins (R0 resection) being associated with the best outcomes. Survival for patients who undergo total gross excision but have histologically positive margins (R1 resection) have a reduced survival in most series