Clinical trialNANot yet recruiting
EUS-guided CDS vs ERCP as First Line in Malignant Distal Obstruction in Borderline Disease (CARPEDIEM-2 Trial)
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage With Lumen-Apposing Stent vs Classical ERCP for First-line Therapy of Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction in Borderline Disease: An Open-label, Multicenter Randomized Trial (CARPEDIEM-2 Trial)
- Outcome
- Ongoing
- Phase
- NA
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Study type
- Interventional
- Start
- 1 May 2024
- Expected end
- 1 May 2027
- Enrollment
- 96 participants
- Sites
- 1
- Primary outcomes
- Delay in days between endoscopic biliary drainage and chemotherapy treatment start
- Sponsor
- Other
- Results posted
- No
- Last update
- 19 April 2024
These are registry fields. A trial card, with population, design, endpoints and result direction each tied to a quote, is not in the data yet.
Ask this document
Answers come only from this document’s own text, as highlighted quotes. If it doesn’t say, you are told so instead of given a guess.
Try
Source text
Brief summary public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate temporal delay (days) between biliary drainage (EUS-CDS vs ERCP as first line therapy) and chemotherapy start in patients with borderline distal malignant biliary obstruction.
Detailed description public domain (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Ecoendoscopy-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) has been extended as a second line treatment in cases of ERCP failure in malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). However, there are clinical trials which have compared it with ERCP as a first line treatment for MDBO in palliative patients, showing similar clinical and technical success and adverse events (AEs) rate between both techniques. Data about the benefit of this techique in borderline patients is still limited. A recent retrospective study (Janet J et al, Ann Surg Oncol 2023) which included borderline patients, found that EUS-CDS group had significantly less delay (days) between biliary drainage and neoadjuvant chemotherapy start than the ERCP group with fewer endoscopy and surgery AEs. Thus, our hypothesis is that EUS-CDS has benefits in terms of decreasing delay between biliary drainage and neoadjuvant chemotherapy start when compared to ERCP in MDBO in borderline patients.
Papers 4
- BackgroundEUS-Guided Choledocho-duodenostomy Using Lumen Apposing Stent Versus ERCP With Covered Metallic Stents in Patients With… DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.04.016↗
- BackgroundPancreatoduodenectomy Following Preoperative Biliary Drainage Using Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Choledochoduodenostomy… DOI 10.1245/s10434-023-13466-8↗
- BackgroundEndoscopic biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction: Which is better - endoscopic retrograde cholangio… DOI 10.1111/den.14186↗
- BackgroundEUS-Guided Biliary Drainage Versus ERCP for the Primary Palliation of Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Multicenter Rand… DOI 10.1038/s41395-018-0122-8↗